September 4th, 2019 
admin Land-based antiship missile systems are an effective tool in countering maritime aggression, and this is being increasingly recognized inside and outside the force. In his planning guidance, Marine Corps Commandant General David Berger wrote, “One possible future [of the Unit Deployment Program] would be the forward deployment of multiple High-Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) batteries armed with long-range anti-ship missiles.” Employing these systems in the littorals of the western Pacific would disrupt current adversary investments and strategy.
…The need for littoral fires is not unique to the western Pacific. Poland has acquired antiship missiles, and the Baltic and Scandinavian countries have operated them for decades. They also are increasingly prevalent in the Black Sea region. Marines armed with potent antiship missiles would be an asset in the Baltic, Bering, Barents, or Black Sea regions—and many other areas around the world.
Intregul articol poate fi citit pe usni.org
Sursa: twitter.com
Rezulta ca Romania a cumparat deja fara sa vrea baterii de coasta si nici n-are habar. Tot ce trebuie sa faca e sa puna HIMARSul la dospit si se fac bateriile de coasta. Unde “dospit” inseamna sa tina aproape de USMC.
#HIMARS #interoperabilitate #barza #tropaim
Posted in 
Tags:
eh, in afara de tinut aproape pentru integrarea lansatoarelor chioare… mai e nevoie si de senzorii specializati pe naval, pe care HIMARS cum e acum, nu cred ca ii are.
Si niste UAS/UAV-uri ar fi inca un plus necesar…
Parca tineam aproape de ei si cu ScanEagle.
Da, dar oare cat mai functioneaza din cele 2 sisteme si ce modernizari au avut? Pe langa modernizarile aparute intre timp, unii au trecut la RQ-21 Blackjack sau alte sisteme echivalente, mai noi… Polonezii tocmai au primit in 2018 primele Blackjack.
Si care e bataia conexiunii de date, ca 100km e cam putin daca vrem sa ghidam rachete anti-nava?
Pretentios mai esti ! Pe 15 August iesim cu ele si zicem ca avem..asta conteaza. :))))
Capacitate bifata!
n’am cumparat nimica, in cel mai bun caz doar camioanele, in articolul ala discutzii despre wannabe rachete AN pe Himars si ca s’ar fi dat 47 mil$ dar nu stie exact pe ce
si daca se integreaza noi nu cumparam munitzia pt ca nu ne trebe
oile n’au nevoie de armament, ca’i apara ciobanul
ele doar paraziteaza bugetul